CLICK HERE FOR THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES »

August 5, 2007

Argumentative Essay: "Abortion, Right and Wrong"

This is not my essay. This is good sample of "Argumentative Essay" I got from college. Written by Rachel Richardson Smith.

Well, this essay is so profound.

Feedback by "Comments" please

Abortion, Right and Wrong

By Rachel Richardson Smith

I cannot bring myself to say I am in favor of abortion. I don’t want anyone to have one. I want people to use contraceptives and for those contraceptives to be foolproof. I want people to be responsible for their actions, mature in their decisions. I want children to be loved, wanted, well cared for.

I cannot bring myself to say I am against choice. I want women who are young, poor, single or all three to be able to direct the course of their lives. I want women who have had all the children they want or can afford or their in bad marriages or destructive relationships to avoid being trapped by pregnancy.

So these days when thousands rally in opposition to legalized abortion, when facilities providing abortions are bombed, when the president speaks glowingly of the growing momentum behind the anti-abortion movement, I find myself increasingly alienated from those pro-life groups.

At the same time, I am overwhelmed with mail from pro-choice groups. They, too, are mobilizing their forces, growing articulate in support of their cause, and they want my support. I am not sure I can give it.

I find myself in the awkward position of being both anti-abortion and pro-choice. Neither group seems to be completely right—or wrong. It is not that I think abortion is wrong for me but acceptable for someone else. The question is far more complex than that.

Part of my problem is that what I think and how I feel about this issue are two entirely different matters. I know that unwanted children are often neglected, even abandoned. I know that making abortion illegal will not stop all women from having them.
I also know from experience the crisis an unplanned pregnancy can cause. Yet I have felt the joy of giving birth, the delight that comes from feeling a baby’s skin against my own. I know how hard it is to parent a child and how deeply dissatisfying it can be. My children sometimes provoke me and cause me endless frustration, but I can still look at them with tenderness and wonder at the miracle of it all. The lessons of my own experience produce conflicting emotions. Theory collides with reality.

It concerns me that bother groups present themselves in absolutes. They are committed and they want me to commit. They do not recognize that gray area where I seem to be languishing. Each group has the right answer—the only answer.

Yet I am uncomfortable in either camp. I have nothing in common with the pro-lifers. I am horrified by their scare tactics, their pictures of well-formed fetuses tossed in a metal pan, their cruel slogans. I cannot condone their flagrant misuse of Scripture and unforgiving sprit. There is meanness about their position that causes them to pass judgment on the lives of women in a way I could never do.

The pro-life groups, with their fundamentalist religious attitudes, have a fear and an abhorrence of sex, especially premarital sex. In their view abortion only compounds the sexual sin. What I find incomprehensible is that even as they are opposed to abortion they are also opposed to alternative solutions. They are squeamish about sex education in the schools. They don’t want teens to have contraceptives without parental consent. They offer little aid or sympathy to unwed mothers. They are the vigilant guardians of a narrow morality.

I wonder how abortion got to be the greatest of all sins? What about poverty, ignorance, hunger, weaponry?

The only thing the anti-abortion groups seem to have right is that abortion is indeed the taking of human life. I simply cannot escape this one glaring fact. Call it what you will—fertilized egg, embryo, fetus. What we have here is human life. If it were just a mass of tissue there would be no debate. So I agree that abortion ends a life. But the anti-abortionists are wrong to call it murder.

The sad truth is that homicide is not always against the law. Our society does not categorically recognize the sanctity of human life. There are a number of legal and apparently socially acceptable ways to take human life. There are a number of legal and apparently socially acceptable ways to take human life. “Justifiable” homicide includes the death penalty, war, killing in self-defense. It seems to me that as a society we need to come to grips with out own ambiguity concerning the value of human life. If we are to value and protect unborn life so stringently, why do we not also value and protect life already born?

Why can’t we see abortion for the human tragedy it is? No woman plans for her life to turn out that way. Even the most effective contraceptives are no guarantee against pregnancy. Loneliness, ignorance, immaturity can lead to decisions (or lack of decisions) that may result in untimely pregnancy. People make mistakes.

What many people seem to misunderstand is that no woman wants to have an abortion. Circumstances demand it; women do it. No woman reacts to abortion with joy. Relief, yes. But also ambivalence, grief, despair, guilt.

The pro-choice groups do not seem to acknowledge that abortion is not a perfect answer. What goes unsaid is that when a woman has an abortion she loses more than an unwanted pregnancy. Often she loses her self-respect. No woman can forget a pregnancy no matter how it ends.

Why can we not view abortion as one of those anguished decisions in which human beings struggle to do the best they can in trying circumstances? Why is abortion viewed so coldly and factually on the one hand and so judgmentally on the other? Why is it not akia to the same painful experience families must sometimes make to allow a loved one to die?

I wonder how we can begin to change the context in which we think about abortion. How can we begin to think about it preemptively? What is it in the trauma of loss of life—be it loved, born or unborn—from which we can learn? There is much I have yet to resolve. Even as I refuse to pass judgments on other women’s lives, I weep for the children who might have been. I suspect I am not alone.

9 comments:

citizenschallenge said...

How sad that no one has commented on this essay. I wonder how many have actually read it?

I originally read it in 1992 and have been trying to share it ever since.

Unfortunately, seems that actually thinking about issues in three and four dimensions is still unpopular.

In any event, thank you for reproducing this excellent essay.

Anonymous said...

Wow. This is a very good essay. I am against abortion but she brings up very good issues. She is almost poetic in this essay. I really enjoyed it. I believe that she is against abortion but is for it under certain circumstances.

Anonymous said...

Wow. This is a very good essay. I am against abortion but she brings up very good issues. She is almost poetic in this essay. I really enjoyed it. I believe that she is against abortion but is for it under certain circumstances.

Anonymous said...

I have always been against abortion, but I do agree with many of the things that were said. This definitely will make people think.

Anonymous said...

I have always been against abortions-simply as they kill an innocent life.People need to be more responsible for their actions.Incredible how sex can be so sinful that one would have to have an abortion because of what they did-their moments of pleasure destroys an innocent life.Once concieved a life is forming.She did bring -up many good points in her essay and i hope people would learn from it.

Anonymous said...

This is a very informative an somewhat persuasive essay for those of us who are undecided on this issue. Everyone has a right to life but as human beings we need to determine the outcome of circumstances before we condemn an individual for the choices they make

citizenschallenge said...

I do understand the complexity of the abortion question and have had to look that dilemma in the eye.

So I don't want to be flippant about it - however,

I would be more impressed with the 'anti-abortion movement' if it showed half as much concern for living children as they seem to for potential children.

For instance, I never heard anti-abortioners cry foul about the incredible number of children we have killed and maimed in our totally counterproductive 'war on terror.' In fact, way too many were going rah,rah,rah kill'em all. Believing that killing imaginary terrorist would solve something (all the while leaving Bin Laden to his own devices)~

Anonymous said...

We had to read this essay for a class I took. It was a small class, just four of us total and I was the only girl/woman in the class. At first the guys' responses were really negative towards the essay. Part of this I think is because they are men and have never had to seriously sit down and think, "what would I do?". The other part I think was that they were kind of offended by the fact that she didn't take a side. They were so confident in their choice on the subject that they at first couldn't see that it's not necessarily an essay to promote or demote abortion, but an essay that sounds more like the frustration and confusion a lot of women go through when thinking about the issue.
When people think about abortion, they tend to think about it one way or the other. The sad truth is, neither side has a solution that would completely resolve the issue. It is a complicated issue, and if both sides didn't have valid arguments it wouldn't be much of an argument.

citizenschallenge said...

So true.
That's why I believe this essay is a 'must read' for everyone interested in the dilemma.

thank you for posting